celebrity.estateAn EGRET.LAW propertyWorld map3D timeline
Home / Great houses / India's 2005 Supreme Court ruling gave the Raja of Mahmudabad's son back his palaces, and…
Case file s244 · Great houses · 1973
1973
Died
14 October 1973 (Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan, Raja of Mahmudabad)
Place
London · United Kingdom
Field
landowner, Muslim League financier · Land and agriculture on the timeline
Legal tradition
Indian law; Enemy Property Act 1968; Supreme Court of India
Historical event
Partition of India; Indo-Pakistani War of 1965
AI illustration: The fort palace of Mahmudabad, Uttar Pradesh, 1970s
Illustration made with AI for celebrity.estate.

India's 2005 Supreme Court ruling gave the Raja of Mahmudabad's son back his palaces, and Parliament rewrote the law to take them again

The Raja of Mahmudabad held one of the largest estates in Oudh, with the Qila at Mahmudabad, Butler Palace in Lucknow and the Metropole Hotel in Nainital†. He backed the Muslim League, left for Iraq in 1945, moved to Pakistan in 1957 and died in London on 14 October 1973. His wife and son, Mohammad Amir Mohammad Khan, stayed in India as citizens. After his death the Custodian of Enemy Property took the estate under the Enemy Property Act of 1968, passed after the 1965 war. The son sued. On 21 October 2005, in Union of India v. Raja Mohammad Amir Mohammad Khan, Justices Ashok Bhan and Altamas Kabir held that heirs who were Indian citizens could recover the property and ordered it returned. The government issued ordinances to block the ruling. In March 2017 Parliament passed the Enemy Property (Amendment and Validation) Act. It vests all enemy property in the Custodian, voids earlier transfers before and after 1968 and bars civil courts from hearing such disputes. The son went back to court; cases under his name against the Union of India were still being decided in 2024 and in June 2026. He died in 2023†. The estate stays with the Custodian.

What the law took from it

A court victory over property is only as safe as the statute behind it, and a government can change the statute after the judgment.

Sources
  1. LiveLawCourt record
  2. CaseMineCourt record
  3. prsindia.orgPress
  4. indiacode.nic.inPress
  5. The Times of IndiaPress
  6. Wikipedia (English)Encyclopedia

Cite as: celebrity.estate, “India's 2005 Supreme Court ruling gave the Raja of Mahmudabad's son back his palaces, and Parliament rewrote the law to take them again,” story s244, https://www.celebrity.estate/mahmudabad-1973, updated 30 October 2026.

Related cases

Each one shares a person, a kind of fight, a subject, a period or a place with this case. The line under each headline says which.

Catherine Palace interior - Amber Room (1)1945 · Catherine Palace, Tsarskoye Selo (Pushkin), Russia; KönigsbeGerman troops packed the Amber Room into 27 crates in 1941, and it has been missing since 1945Shared: also Great houses; 28 years apart; also EuropeThe Amber Room was a set of amber wall panels made in Prussia. In 1716 King Frederick William I of Prussia gave it to Peter the Great.NBC News and 4 moreAI illustration: Compton Place, Eastbourne, the house where the 10th Duke of Devonshire died in 19501950 · Compton Place, Eastbourne, SussexThe 10th Duke of Devonshire died in 1950 before his tax plan matured, and his heirs took 17 years to pay 80 percent death dutyShared: also Great houses; 23 years apart; also EuropeEdward Cavendish, 10th Duke of Devonshire, owned Chatsworth, Hardwick Hall, Bolton Abbey, Lismore Castle in Ireland and about 83,000 acres in Derbyshire alone.chatsworth.org and 5 moreAI illustration: The Palazzo Doria Pamphilj on the Via del Corso, Rome2000 · Palazzo Doria Pamphilj, Via del Corso, RomeRome's last Doria Pamphilj princess adopted two English babies, and her daughter went to court to keep her brother's surrogate-born children out of the inheritanceShared: also Great houses; 27 years apart; also EuropeThe Palazzo Doria Pamphilj on Via del Corso holds Velázquez's portrait of Pope Innocent X and two Caravaggios. It is probably the largest palace in Rome still in private hands.advocate.com and 6 moreCharles Bedaux: Charles Bedaux and filmakers1944 · Château de Candé, Monts, Indre-et-Loire, France; Miami, FlorCharles Bedaux hosted the Windsor wedding at Candé, died in FBI custody awaiting treason charges, and his widow gave the château to FranceShared: also Great houses; 29 years apart; also EuropeCharles Bedaux made a fortune selling the Bedaux system of work measurement. On 23 July 1927 he and his wife Fern bought the Château de Candé in the Loire valley.domainecande.fr and 2 moreAI illustration: Tyntesfield, the Gothic Revival house near Bristol2001 · Tyntesfield, Wraxall, North Somerset, EnglandLord Wraxall's will gave Tyntesfield to 19 relatives and ordered a fast sale, and the public raised millions to buy itShared: also Great houses; 28 years apart; also EuropeWilliam Gibbs bought Tyntes Place near Bristol in 1843 and renamed it Tyntesfield. His family firm, Antony Gibbs & Sons, held an effective monopoly on importing Peruvian guano into Europe and North America from 1847.BBC News and 4 moreHarpur-Crewe baronets: Calke Abbey house1981 · Calke Abbey, Ticknall, Derbyshire, EnglandCharles Harpur-Crewe died in 1981, an £8 million tax bill fell on Calke Abbey, and the house went to the nation with everything in itShared: also Great houses; 8 years apart; also EuropeThe Harpur family held Calke in Derbyshire from the 17th century. Their baronetcy ended with Sir Vauncey Harpur Crewe in 1924. The last generations were reclusive and kept nearly everything they bought.UK Parliament, Hansard and 5 more